Skip to main content

Table 3 Logistic regressions of selected outcome variable related to the National program for quality indicators in community healthcare on PCPs’ personal and professional characteristics*

From: Primary care physicians’ perceptions of Israel’s national program for quality indicators in community healthcare– 2010 and 2020

 

Odds ratio (95% confidence interval)

Monitoring performance is important 1

Monitoring contributes to improved quality 2

Support continuing the program 3

The program increases workload 4

Job satisfaction related to the program 5

Age (Reference group: Age < 45)

45–60

0.47 (0.28–0.81)

(p value = 0.006 )

1.32 (0.92–1.90)

0.71 (0.44–1.14)

1.17 (0.81–1.68)

1.64 (1.11–2.42)

(p value = 0.01 )

> 60

0.71 (0.38–1.33)

1.64 (1.07–2.51)

(p value = 0.02 )

1.23 (0.70–2.17)

0.98 (0.64–1.49)

1.82 (1.16–2.87)

(p value = 0.009 )

Born in Israel

0.92 (0.62–1.39)

1.17 (0.85–1.61)

0.86 (0.57–1.30)

1.15 (0.83–1.60)

0.71 (0.49–1.02)

Jewish

0.26 (0.15–0.47)

(p value = 7.5*10− 6)

0.3 (0.24–0.52)

(p value = 1.3*10− 7)

0.41 (0.25–0.67)

(p value = 3.8*10− 4)

1.24 (0.86–1.79)

0.20 (0.13–0.29)

(p value = 1.8*10− 15)

Male

0.67 (0.45–0.99)

(p value = 0.05 )

0.65 (0.48–0.88)

(p value = 0.006 )

0.86 (0.58–1.27)

1.29 (0.95–1.75)

0.97 (0.70–1.34)

Board certification (Reference group: Not board certified)

Family physician

0.36 (0.22–0.59)

(p value = 5.1*10− 5)

0.46 (0.32–0.65)

(p value = 1.2*10− 5)

0.36 (0.23–0.58)

(p value = 1.9*10− 5)

1.24 (0.88–1.76)

0.37 (0.25–0.52)

(p value = 4.1*10− 8)

Internist and other

0.71 (0.41–1.24)

0.59 (0.40–0.85)

(p value = 0.005 )

0.44 (0.26–0.72)

(p value = 0.001 )

0.88 (0.62–1.27)

0.86 (0.59–1.24)

Work primarily as specialist

1.74 (1.02–2.97)

(p value = 0.04 )

0.98 (0.64–1.49)

1.25 (0.73–2.12)

1.33 (0.88–2.03)

1.57 (0.99–2.48)

Mode of employment (Reference group: Independent only)

Salaried only

0.71 (0.42–1.20)

1.05 (0.72–1.52)

1.18 (0.71–1.97)

1.11 (0.77–1.59)

1.35 (0.92–1.97)

Salaried and Independent

1.68 (0.90–3.12)

1.03 (0.68–1.58)

1.01 (0.59–1.75)

1.60 (1.05–2.44)

(p value = 0.03 )

1.16 (0.75–1.81)

Response via Email

1.22 (0.74-2.00)

1.05 (0.73–1.51)

0.80 (0.50–1.28)

0.81 (0.56–1.17)

0.80 (0.55–1.18)

Study year 2020

0.52 (0.32–0.87)

(p value = 0.01 )

0.65 (0.45–0.94)

(p value = 0.02 )

0.85 (0.53–1.36)

0.93 (0.64–1.34)

0.65 (0.44–0.95)

(p value = 0.03 )

Cox & Snell R2

0.12

0.09

0.17

0.09

0.19

Nagelkereke R2

0.21

0.13

0.24

0.12

0.26

N (unweighted)

1022

1017

909

1017

1015

  1. 1 Important or very important; 2 To a great or very great extent; 3 Yes; 4 To a great or very great extent; 5 Satisfied or very satisfied
  2. * The model also included data about the HMO in which the PCP works
  3. Bold indicates significance at p < 0.05